North Fork Mill Site, North Fork, Ca.
6:30 pm
The meeting was called to order by President Stuart Pincus at 4:44 p.m.
The Pledge of Allegiance was given. President were Board members Chuck Borden, Tom Burdette, Steve Christianson, Volney Dunavan, Richard Hancock, and Mary Proper. Tammy Armstrong was present as an alternate for Sandy Chaille. Also present was CDC Grant Administrator Jill Mross.
The agenda was approved. There was no public comment.
Organizational reports:
Management Committee report:
Some specific points:
1) We all need to be aware that the County is satisfied that the EPA is satisfied with our progress so long as we continue to work diligently.
2) Nonetheless, all must be signed off etc. by Sept 15 of this year.
3) The County wants us to address the dip tank this fall; asbestos work is to be done in the winter.
4) The County agreed with us in all but three areas:
a) Interest rate forgiveness: the loan document talks about two different dates and rates.
b) Limit of 365 days of construction to draw down the money; we can complete the work in that amount of time, but not get the sign-off’s within that time frame. We need up to 90 more days for sign-offs.
c) The explanation as to why all documents show a $900,000 loan is that this is what the County needs to show the EPA; the forgiveness of the $200,000 is to us by the County and not to the County by the EPA. The County will supply a separate loan schedule based on the $700,000. This will lower the amount the County will have for future loans.
5) Additionally, they apologized and seemed to understand our concerns regarding the Site Manager. They have provided a separate document about this.
6) The Teepee burner process should be able to go forward this fall.
7) We hope to get the loan documents this week.
8) The original meeting had to do with the integration of the Radanovich (asbestos) grant and the Brownsfield loan. Would the County be amenable to phased development of the site? We can integrate so long as they are clearly stated as separate line items on any contracts, etc. we put out. The asbestos grant is only for Kiln B. We can start moving forward on that immediately, using the asbestos grant. We would need to contract with someone who would be the Site Manager. It would be prepared identifying Phase I and Phase II. Only I would go forward at the beginning. They may allow concurrent work which could save money. The existing report also will probably satisfy the requirements of the EE/CA (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis) for the EPA. For the most part, only permits are required and not a lot else. Tom and Jill will go forward on this.
9) Elissa Brown, Grant Writer for Madera County and sometimes the CDC, asked to speak and pointed out her belief that the Radanovich grant had nothing to do with asbestos but was for Economic Development.
10a. Steve explained the potable water RFP. The existing telemetry system failed about a year ago. This project will bring potable water on site to current County standards. A video will be done on both wells. If both are bad, the RFP will be withdrawn and revised. Elissa Brown: this is probably the Economic Development Grant. We need to verify which grant. After that, it was moved/seconded and passed that we issue an RFP to begin Phase II of potable water system improvements and well survey, charged to appropriate grant. Bid due date will be July 25, to be awarded Aug 1.
10b. Following our preliminary setting of a policy regarding model airplane use on site, our phone calls are down to zero. We need to work with non-members, folks who are insured through the model airplane organization. The only change needed is that the signs say 2 p.m. so we will change to that time. They will put up a temporary structure to protect them from sun. It was m/s/c to adopt the policy modifying the ending time from 1:30 to 2 p.m.
10c. Steve Parks has recovered documents off our computer hard drive and is putting the system all back together. “We need to buy Jill a new computer” says Richard Hancock. It was decided at this point to give Jill the best existing computer, put the second best in accounting, and the third in the lobby.
10d. The question of whether we should spearhead this year’s Fall Festival was discussed. We asked the NF Women’s Club if they would be interested in taking over the craft fair portion. They will take it to their meeting and let us know. Tom suggested we offer use of the mill site for extra Grizzly parking.
10e. Volney will distribute Paul’s and Gerrit’s Bylaw recommendations.
11. The Brownsfield loan packet was not received, so we may need to call a special meeting. Tom indicated that Tim Snyder’s latest parcel map has increased the number of parcels from 15 to around 25 which could be increased by 8 or 9 more, if the Pitcher Creek grant is received. According to Tom, the County is eager for us to submit the parcel map; we will need to add a small outlot for the water tank. We don’t have the funds necessary to pay for the kind of development we want. The Pitcher Creek grant will allow for this. This puts us in a strong position with any developer and even without a cleanup, we will have increased the value of the property.
There being no further business to come before the Board, it adjourned at 6:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Volney Dunavan, Secretary